Comments on: Merits of an Aboriginal petition to C24

By: Referendum: Boycott vs. Voting No – Thinking Sovereignty

Referendum: Boycott vs. Voting No – Thinking Sovereignty — Sat, 24 Jun 2023 16:39:57 +0000

[…] Another way to make an active action against the referendum on the side of a boycott is by a petition to c24 as I blogged about here. […]

By: Jessica Savage

Jessica Savage — Mon, 04 Jan 2021 10:59:55 +0000

In reply to lawyersorgraverobbers. IMO there can be no Treaty or "agreements" until the Uluru Statement is off the table. I would hope that such a petition will wipe the table clean to start again (with fresh ingredients!).

By: lawyersorgraverobbers

lawyersorgraverobbers — Sat, 02 Jan 2021 23:03:31 +0000

Just a couple of comments from a novice. Go for the petition you can do it for each state and a national one. It can then be used as a basis on how the treaty process is set up because the current process in Victoria is a process set up by the state government lawyers so as to make Dan Andrews and his Government look good its real objective needs to be a treaty for people. To construct a treaty those groups negotiating the treaty must be very much part of creating the process of treaty prior to discussing treaty. In a country like Australia where all forms of government have been corrupted by a judicial process built on piracy whose sole purpose is to exploit and not to create, it is essential to keep that corruption out of the treaty process.

The secret to making a good cake is to begin with untainted ingredients otherwise the cake will spoil!