https://thinkingsovereignty.com/2021/01/13/an-australian-declaration-of-autochthony/ Thinking Sovereignty Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:05:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8 https://thinkingsovereignty.com/2021/01/13/an-australian-declaration-of-autochthony/#comment-68 Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:05:09 +0000 https://decolonisethemind.wordpress.com/?p=829#comment-68 […] us in under the Australian political representation system so they can speak with a sovereign, autochthonous (indigenous) […]

]]> https://thinkingsovereignty.com/2021/01/13/an-australian-declaration-of-autochthony/#comment-67 Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:23:37 +0000 https://decolonisethemind.wordpress.com/?p=829#comment-67 […] been impossible to implement, as without the preamble there would be no authoritative basis and no autochthony of the new republic. In the end, the republic question did better than the preamble, and officially […]

]]> https://thinkingsovereignty.com/2021/01/13/an-australian-declaration-of-autochthony/#comment-66 Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:01:08 +0000 https://decolonisethemind.wordpress.com/?p=829#comment-66 […] case who that party is – whether it be the foreign Crown or the squatter Parliament with no autochthony. Also related – why is Australia one of the few countries with compulsory voting with penalty […]

]]> https://thinkingsovereignty.com/2021/01/13/an-australian-declaration-of-autochthony/#comment-65 Mon, 10 May 2021 08:37:15 +0000 https://decolonisethemind.wordpress.com/?p=829#comment-65 […] I suspect the same-sex marriage plebiscite was a “dry run” to test using the Referendum Machinery Act on a non-section 128 constitutional amendment, to iron-out any wrinkles and smooth the way forward. Like the same-sex marriage plebiscite, the Voice referendum will also not be a constitutional amendment under section 128. (The Voice referendum will be a constitutional reenactment partly using section 52(xxxviii).) […]

]]> https://thinkingsovereignty.com/2021/01/13/an-australian-declaration-of-autochthony/#comment-64 Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:52:01 +0000 https://decolonisethemind.wordpress.com/?p=829#comment-64 […] seems to have originated from both him and Noel Pearson. Uphold and Recognise, a think-tank which had a heavy influence over the the Uluru Statement package was co-founded by Damien Freeman, a lawyer at the Australian Catholic […]

]]> https://thinkingsovereignty.com/2021/01/13/an-australian-declaration-of-autochthony/#comment-63 Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:25:45 +0000 https://decolonisethemind.wordpress.com/?p=829#comment-63 […] see how Catholic doctrine might end up in the Statement. Uphold and Recognise, a think-tank which had influence over the process leading to the Uluru Statement was co-founded by Damien Freeman, a lawyer at the Australian Catholic University. Greg Craven […]

]]> https://thinkingsovereignty.com/2021/01/13/an-australian-declaration-of-autochthony/#comment-62 Sun, 31 Jan 2021 12:48:38 +0000 https://decolonisethemind.wordpress.com/?p=829#comment-62 […] red spot in the blue zone is the enshrinement of the Voice in the constitution. Then comes the Declaration of Independence/Recognition. The red dots are agreement-making – although it doesn’t matter when agreement-making […]

]]> https://thinkingsovereignty.com/2021/01/13/an-australian-declaration-of-autochthony/#comment-61 Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:46:22 +0000 https://decolonisethemind.wordpress.com/?p=829#comment-61 This is an extremely important piece in unpacking the “Voice”. But, did Freeman/Leeser lean on Noel to give their concepts some credibility? What phone calls were made? Also, are Freeman/Leeser the reason the Voice is seemingly being run out of the Law faculty at UNSW?

]]>